Baker v. Kammerer’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
September 2018
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Sanborn v. Commonwealth · Moore v. Commonwealth · Commonwealth v. Maddox · Lexington Glass Co. v. Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance Co. · Wallace v. Leedhanachoke
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Because a multitude of factors may be considered by a trial judge addressing such an issue, judges are free to consider a spectrum of potential remedies. In an appropriate case, a judge might reasonably conclude that insurance evidence should be freely admitted. Another judge might choose a middle ground, allowing the identification of a witness as an agent of the defendant, but refusing to allow the disclosure that a defendant is insured. Likewise, applying the balancing test of KRE 403 might lead to the conclusion that certain insurance evidence is inadmissible.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Woolum v. Hillman“presentation of evidence as well as the scope and duration of cross-examination”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“one of the most crucial goals of cross-examination”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.