Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 187 SW3D 565 - State v. Stevens

State v. Stevens’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 2010
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ashe v. Swenson · United States v. Arvizu · Illinois v. Wardlow · Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole v. M Scott · State v. Ross

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Being quite specific and quite narrow, all my ruling does is it shows that all the facts were considered by the Court and pretty clear on the record that all the facts were considered concerning whether or not there was reasonable suspicion to stop and — or probable cause.... It was the ultimate issue of fact in the case. 8”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.