Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 187 U.S. 177 - Pickens v. Roy

Pickens v. Roy’s Empirical Analysis

187 U.S. 177 · 1902

Citation profile

289
cited by 289 later decisions
12
cited 12 times by the Supreme Court
21
states following
November 1983
most recently cited

108 federal appellate · 66 district · 64 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 289 later decisions (12 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 1983 · most notably Butz v. Economou (1978), Lion Bonding & Surety Co. v. Karatz (1923)

108 federal appellate · 66 district · 64 state decisions — followed in 21 states

820190219101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedPickens v. Dent (from Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Fred Bardes v. First National Bank of Hawarden Iowa · Metcalf Brothers Company v. Benjamin Barker Jr · American School of Magnetic Healing v. McAnnulty · Frazier v. Southern Loan & Trust Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 289 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “•‘The course to be pursued bus been well defined in cases in which there is a conflict as to jurisdiction between the state and the federal courls. Briefly stated, the rule is this: Considering the peculiar character of our government, and keeping in view the forbearance which courts of co-ordinate jurisdiction exorcise towards each other, it follows that the court which first obtains rightful jurisdiction over the subject-matter of a controversy must by all other courts be permitted to proceed therein to final judgment. The federal courts will not interfere with the administration of affairs lawfully in the custody and jurisdiction of a state court, nor will they permii the courts of the states to interfere concerning litigation rightfully submitted to the decision of the courts of the United States.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The bankruptcy act of 1898 does not in the least modify this rule, but with unusual carefulness guards it in all of its details, provided the suit pending in the state court was instituted more than four months before the District Court of the United States had adjudicated the bankruptcy of the party entitled to or interested in the subject-matter of such controversy.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.