Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 187 VA 522 - McDorman v. Smyth

McDorman v. Smyth’s Empirical Analysis

1948

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
2
states following
March 2011
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently March 2011 · most notably Commonwealth Ex Rel. Stevens v. Myers (1965), Peyton v. Williams (1965)

9 federal appellate · 31 state decisions

18019481950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McNally v. Hill · Myers v. Commonwealth · Clark v. Commonwealth · Butler v. Commonwealth · Commonwealth v. Beavers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Habeas corpus is a writ of inquiry granted to determine whether a person ‘is detained without lawful authority.’ Virginia Code, 1942 (Michie), section 5848. It is available only where the release of the prisoner from his immediate detention will follow as a result of an order in his favor. It is not available to secure a judicial determination of any question which, even if determined in the prisoner’s favor, could not affect the lawfulness of his immediate custody and detention. It cannot be used to modify or revise a judgment of conviction.” Smyth v. Holland, 199 Va. 92, 96 , 97 S. E. 2d 745 ; Smyth v. Midgett, 199 Va. 727, 730 , 101 S. E. 2d 575 .”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.