187 Wash. 2d 85 - State v. Case’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 2020
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 924
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · Almendarez-Torres v. United States · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Sullivan v. Louisiana
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A 'stipulation' is an express waiver that concedes, for purposes of trial, the truth of some alleged fact, with the effect that one party need offer no evidence to prove it and the other is not allowed to disprove it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“unless that evidence pertained to another element of the crime and unless the trial judge properly found that the probative value of such evidence outweighed its significant prejudicial effect.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.