Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 187 W. Va. 737 - State v. Morris

187 W. Va. 737 - State v. Morris’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
February 2004
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 181 W. Va. 387 - State Ex Rel. Hagg v. Spillers · 187 W. Va. 596 - Crain v. Bordenkircher · 187 W. Va. 651 - State Ex Rel. Smith v. Skaff · 184 W. Va. 251 - State Ex Rel. Moomau v. Hamilton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]his Court believes that the Legislature, by inserting specific language in W.Va. Code, 17B-4-3(b), relating to imprisonment in the ‘penitentiary’ in conjunction with language relating to a ‘mandatory jail sentence’, departed from its usual method of describing sanctions for crimes and intended that individuals convicted serve actual jail sentences and not be eligible for the usual panoply of options that result in less onerous conditions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “such person shall be guilty of a felony, and, upon conviction thereof, shall be imprisoned in the penitentiary for not less than one year nor more than three years and, in addition to such mandatory jail sentence, shall be fined not less than three thousand dollars nor more than five thousand dollars.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “[t]his deviation from the mandatory confinement ... shall exist until the state correctional facility under construction at Mt. Olive is complete and open for the housing of inmates.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.