¶1Judgment of County Court reversed and judgment of Municipal Court affirmed, with costs to appellants in this court and in the County Court. Held, that there was sufficient evidence of an employment of the plaintiffs by the defendant through his agent to effect an exchange of defendant’s property and that it was error to reverse'the judgment of the Municipal Court upon the ground that the proof was insufficient to support the finding of such an employment. All concurred. _
188 A.D. 905
Abbey v. Wichmann
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 15, 1919
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1919-04-15
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently September 1983
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1919-04-15
View the full empirical analysis of this case →