Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 188 A.D.2d 1034 - Smith v. Cutson

Smith v. Cutson’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
March 1999
most recently cited

4 federal appellate ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “where plaintiff was induced by fraud, misrepresentation or deception to refrain from filing a timely action.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “contain[ed] no evidence of fraud, misrepresentations, deception, or intentional concealment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.