Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 188 Ariz. 252 - Acker v. CSO CHEVIRA

Acker v. CSO CHEVIRA’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
3
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently July 2018 · most notably Luchanski v. Officer J.L. Congrove (1998), Mobilisa, Inc. v. Doe (2007)

26 state decisions

160199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1915 · 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 28 U.S.C. § 1915A

Relies on Neitzke v. Williams · Bounds v. Smith · Adkins v. E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Co. · Franklin v. Oregon · Jackson II v. State of Arizona

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A court's inherent authority `may be defined as such powers as are necessary to the ordinary and efficient exercise of jurisdiction.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.