Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 188 Ark. 406 - Armstrong v. McCluskey

Armstrong v. McCluskey’s Empirical Analysis

1933

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
January 1979
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Briggs v. Steele · Holt v. Kirby · Challiss v. McCrum · Smith v. Corege · VanDeventer v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To constitute usury there must either be an agreement between the parties by which the borrower promises to pay, and the lender knowingly receives, a higher rate of interest than the statute allows for the loan or forbearance of money, or such greater rate of interest must be knowingly and intentionally “reserved, taken, or secured” for such loan of forbearance. It is essential, in order to establish the plea of usury, that there was a loan or forbearance of money and that for such forbearance there was an intent or agreement to take unlawful interest, and that such unlawful interest was actually taken or reserved.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “(4) that he has no knowledge of any fact which would impair the validity of the instrument or render it valueless.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.