Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 188 Ark. 550 - Moore v. Brasel

Moore v. Brasel’s Empirical Analysis

1934

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 1963
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wait v. Stanton · Eureka Stone Co. v. First Christian Church · Arnold v. McBride · Craig v. Craig · Jenkins v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * The intent to defraud subsequent creditors is not made to appear merely because of outstanding liabilities against the grantor— these liabilities must be shown to have been in excess of all property retained by him. The chancellor found, from the testimony, that James Brasel was solvent at the time the gift was made to his wife and we think this finding is supported by the testimony.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.