In Re Miller’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 523 · 11 U.S.C. § 528 (§ 229 of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on Coggin v. Coggin · Marathon Restaurant Corp. v. Three Bros. Development & Construction Co. (In Re Barr) · Client's Security Fund v. Dahowski (In Re Dahowski) · Agway Insurance v. Grant (In Re Grant) · In Re Wilson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(3) Enlargement Limited. The court may enlarge the time for taking an action under Rules ... 4007(c) ..., only to the extent and under the conditions stated in those rules.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.