Ramirez v. Whelan (In Re Ramirez)’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently September 2012
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1307 · 11 U.S.C. § 348 · 11 U.S.C. § 362
Relies on Tsafaroff v. Taylor · In the Matter of Daniel L Lybrook and Linda Lou Lybrooks · State Airlines Inc British Aviation Insurance Company Ltd v. Menut G · In Re Bystrek · Robb v. Lybrook (In Re Lybrook)
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“should not be read as a nullification act. It is not designed to change what has gone before but, rather, to leave matters as they existed on the date of conversion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.