Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

188 Cal. 663

James v. Rowe

California Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1922

California Supreme Court · decided 1922-05-02

Decided 1922-05-02

¶1At the close of the argument the court rendered its opinion as follows:

It is the opinion of the court that there is enough evidence in this case to uphold the finding of the trial court that at the time of the making of the will the testatrix was not competent to remember her affairs sufficiently to make a will or to remember her relatives and keep the matter in mind long enough to complete the task. Upon that ground the judgment of the court below is affirmed.

¶2The court expresses no opinion as to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the finding that the will was not properly executed.

¶3The judgment is affirmed.

¶4Shaw, C. J., Lawlor, J., Wilbur, J., Lennon, J., Shurtleff, J., Sloane, J., and Richards, J., pro tem.,concurred.

/188/cal/663 · .json · Public domain