Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 188 Cal. 717 - In Re Drew

In Re Drew’s Empirical Analysis

1922

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
1
states following
June 2021
most recently cited

32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently June 2021 · most notably 19 Cal. 2d 488 - In Re Bell (1942), 16 Cal. 2d 701 - In Re Connor (1940)

32 state decisions

19019221930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 53 Cal. App. 85 - Lobree v. L. E. White Lumber Co. · 43 Cal. App. 651 - Drew v. Superior Court · Drew v. Superior Court of Mendocino County · 47 Cal. App. 150 - Drew v. Superior Court

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “not only had his day in court to attack the validity of this judgment, but ... had several such days, on each of which he could have urged this objection, but did not do so”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The petitioner cannot be allowed to present his reasons against the validity of the judgment against him piecemeal by successive proceedings for the same general purpose.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.