Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 188 Colo. 113 - People v. Gould

People v. Gould’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
7
states following
March 2007
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently March 2007 · most notably HealthONE v. Rodriguez ex rel. Rodriguez (2002), State v. Rivera (1980)

4 federal appellate · 28 state decisions

2501975198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Reed v. Reed · Eisenstadt v. Baird · West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish · Norvell v. State of Illinois · State v. Kelly

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In the instant case, we believe that the need for treating males and females differently in enacting the rape statute is clearly reasonable. The statute satisfied the real, if not compelling need to protect potential female victims from rape by males. However, for obvious physiological as well as sociological reasons we perceive no need by males for protection against females from rape which would be sufficient to demand legislation attention. The fact that the law does not provide the same protection to males as it does to females does not deny the male perpetrator the equal protection of the law. The classification is logical and rational. The individual’s, as well as the government’s interests are apparent. We do not find the statutes constitutionally infirm.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “C.R.S. 1963, 40-3-40!. Rape. (1) Any male who has sexual intercourse with a female person not his spouse commits rape, if: (d) the female is less than 16 years old and the offender is at least two years older than the female.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.