Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 188 F.1d 707 - In re Hurst

In re Hurst’s Empirical Analysis

188 F. 707 · 1911

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
October 1926
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 3 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Scott v. Neely · Keppel v. Tiffin Savings Bank · Cates v. Allen · Glenny v. Langdon · Trimble v. Woodhead

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Will Tearney be allowed to prove and secure pro rata payment of the $14,000 which he paid for the properties? I think not, for this debt, if it be considered such, arose from fraudulent intent and designs, and courts will leave parties guilty of fraud without remedy. But will a court of bankruptcy go farther, and punish the fraudulent grantee by refusing him the right to participate, with an honest and undisputed debt in the funds collected by the trustee for the equal benefit of all honest debts of the bankrupt, properly proven? I tnink not.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.