In re Scheier’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 federal appellate · 2 district ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““The second question certified must be answered in the negative for the-same reason, and for the, additional reason that the statute does not permit the debtor to select other property in lieu of provisions and fuel for his family and feed for the animals therein named.””

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. In re Swanson · In re Crook

2. ““To eaeli householder, two cows, with their calves, five swine, two stands of bees, thirty-six domestic fowls, and provisions and fuel for the comfortable maintenance of such householder and family for six months, also feed for such animals for six months: Provided, that in case such householder shall not possess or shall not desire to retain the animals above named, he may select from his property and retain other property not to exceed two hundred and fifty dollars, coin, in value.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. In re Swanson

3. ““The fact that the other partner has consented to the allowance of the exemption does not change the rule.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. In re Crook