Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 188 F.2d 116 - Weinstein v. Sea View, Inc.

Weinstein v. Sea View, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

188 F.2d 116 · 1951

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
March 2000
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Huntington v. Attrill · Sullivan v. Associated Billposters & Distributors of United States & Canada · Bowles v. Farmers Nat. Bank of Lebanon · Anding v. Davis · Metzger v. Joseph

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “All laws made or to be made for the suppression of gambling or gaming, are remedial and not penal statutes, and shall be so construed by the courts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.