Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 188 F.2d 543 - Plaut v. Munford

Plaut v. Munford’s Empirical Analysis

188 F.2d 543 · 1951

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
2
states following
November 2006
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently November 2006 · most notably The Central Trust Company and Albert E. Heekin, Jr., Co-Executors of the Estate of Albert E. Heekin, Deceased v. The United States. Katharine Heekin Herrlinger, James R. Heekin, Jr., and the Central Trust Company, Executors Under the Will of James J. Heekin, Deceased v. The United States. The Central Trust Company, Successor and Trustee Under the Will of Alma R. Heekin, Deceased v. The United States (1962), President of the Manhattan Co. v. Armour (1953)

16 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

110195119601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 811

Relies on Mahler v. Commissioner · Williams v. Commissioner · Nichols v. Tuffy · Bryant v. Commissioner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “shall be deemed to be its fair market value at the time of acquisition.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.