Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 188 F.2d 783 - Fischman v. Raytheon Mfg. Co.

Fischman v. Raytheon Mfg. Co.’s Empirical Analysis

188 F.2d 783 · 1951

Citation profile

293
cited by 293 later decisions
6
cited 6 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

133 federal appellate · 27 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 293 later decisions (6 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2017 · most notably Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder (1976), Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug Stores (1975)

133 federal appellate · 27 district · 7 state decisions

11401951196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bell v. Hood · Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Rigsby · Cope v. Anderson · Rawlings v. Ray

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 293 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]hen, to conduct actionable under Sec. 11 of the 1933 Act, there is added the ingredient of fraud, then that conduct becomes actionable under Sec. 10(b) * * *.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “****** “(2) offers or sells a security * * by the use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or of the mails, by means of * * * oral communication, which includes an untrue statement of a material fact or omits to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading (the purchaser not knowing of such untruth or omission), and who shall not sustain the burden of proof that he did not know, and in the exercise of reasonable care could not have known, of such untruth or omission, shall be liable to the person purchasing such security from him * *”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “a shelter or sanctuary for those who defraud investors”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.