Allison v. Mackey’s Empirical Analysis
188 F.2d 983 · 1951
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently February 2005
15 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Lenman v. Jones · 2 App. D.C. 207 - Barbour v. Hickey · Reilly v. Cullinane · 36 App. D.C. 476 - Bride v. Reeves
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““. . . Such matters outside the pleadings having been thus presented and considered, the court said that the motion to dismiss was required by Rule 12(b), to be treated as one for summary judgment, and that upon the facts disclosed by the pleadings and the memorandum of points and authorities, summary judgment should not have been granted.” (Our emphasis.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.