Harold Bibeau’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
7 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently August 2020 · most notably Labauve v. Olin Corp. (2005), Qwest Communications Corp. v. City of Berkeley (2002)
7 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. Creighton · Malley v. Briggs · Singleton v. Wulff · Wilson v. Garcia · Rochin v. People of California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It would stretch the rule that individuals are presumed to know their legal obligations to the breaking point to presume that they are aware of every report, white paper, and floor statement delivered within the halls of the legislature. The legislative report, like the 1987 Oregon legislation, may have given [plaintiff] actual notice, in which case he would be barred. But [plaintiff] claims that he was unaware of either, and therefore his state of awareness is a contested question of fact that cannot be resolved on summary judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“We do not address whether this or any other harm Bibeau claims to have suffered amounts to a cognizable injury under Bibeau's various state and federal law theories.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Harold Bibeau“a litany of news reports and other public revelations regarding the * * * experiments,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.