United States v. Lloyd’s Empirical Analysis
188 F.3d 184 · 1999
Citation profile
20 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently October 2014 · most notably United States v. Pelullo (2005), Kevin Haugh v. Warden Booker (2000)
20 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bailey v. United States · Bousley v. United States · United States v. Hayman · Davis v. United States · Trident Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“made retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]hat the right is founded on statutory interpretation rather than on a new rule of constitutional law is of no moment for purposes of the limitation period under 2255”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The District Court may have been correct in characterizing the Supreme Court’s reference to “more serious charges” as dictum. Nevertheless, it must be respected as a considered pronouncement to be followed in the federal system until and unless modified by the Supreme Court itself. The District Court’s requirement that Lloyd demonstrate innocence of any dismissed charges was at odds with the Supreme Court’s express formulation of the procedural conditions for relief.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.