Batistic v. Pilliod’s Empirical Analysis
1960
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 5 U.S.C. § 1001 · 5 U.S.C. § 1009 · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1253 (§ 243 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1254 (§ 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Jay v. Boyd · United States ex rel. Dolenz v. Shaughnessy · United States ex rel. Leong Choy Moon v. Shaughnessy · United States ex rel. Ciannamea v. Neelly · United States of America Ex Rel. Angelo Antonio Cantisani v. R. J. Holton, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization Service of Chicago
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.