188 F. Supp. 2d 730 - White v. Engler’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
3 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 20 U.S.C. § 1681 (§ 901 of the Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972) · 20 U.S.C. § 1687 (§ 908 of the Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972) · 29 U.S.C. § 794 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000D · 42 U.S.C. § 2000D · 42 U.S.C. § 2000D
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Ex Parte: Edward T Young · Will v. Michigan Department of State Police · Friends of the Earth Incorporateds v. Laidlaw Environmental Services Inc
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the provisions of any other Federal statute prohibiting discrimination by recipients of Federal financial assistance.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. A.W. v. THE JERSEY CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION JEFFREY v. OSOWSKI, FORMER DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF SPECIAL EDUCATION BARBARA GANTWERK, DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS SYLVIA ELIAS, FORMER EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF PUPIL PERSONNEL SERVICES PRISCILLA PETROSKY, ASSOCIATE SUPERINTENDENT FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION JOHN IWANOWSKI MARY HEPBURN JOAN EDMISTON DENISE BRAAK MARY MACEACHERN EDWARD FAUERBACH, LEARNING DISABILITIES TEACHER-CONSULTANTS NORMA CHRISOMALIS GWENDOLYN JACKSON LINDA COLON RONNE BASSMAN WILLIAM RONZITTI ROXANNE JOHNSON, SUPERVISORS OF SPECIAL EDUCATION SHANETTE GREEN, TEACHER MELINDA ZANGRILLO, COORDINATOR OF COMPLIANCE JANE DOE AND JOHN DOE (1) — (5), ALL IN THEIR OFFICIAL AND INDIVIDUAL CAPACITIES, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION JEFFREY v. OSOWSKI BARBARA GANTWERK MELINDA ZANGRILLO, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERVENOR · Aw v. The Jersey City Public Schools“The Court is satisfied that Plaintiffs have standing to pursue such action. The Court is also satisfied that the NAACCP has standing to pursue this action on behalf of its members.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]herefore, 'all of the operations' of these departments are a 'program or activity' for purposes of Title VI, ...which are an operation of the Department of Treasury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.