188 Ill. App. 3d 278 - People v. Bailey’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
March 2015
most recently cited
13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Brown v. Allen · Howard v. United States · 103 Ill. 2d 192 - People v. Jordan · 73 Ill. 2d 204 - People v. Lutz · 145 Ill. App. 3d 626 - People v. Jackson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““While a common-law breaking is no longer an essential element of the crime of burglary [citations], the statute requires an entry which is both without authority and with intent to commit a felony or theft. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1967, chap. 38, par. 19 — 1.) A criminal intent formulated after a lawful entry will not satisfy the statute. But authority to enter a business building, or other building open to the public, extends only to those who enter with a purpose consistent with the reason the building is open.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Hopkins“a building with intent to commit a theft cannot be said to be within the -6- authority granted those who might enter”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“with intent to commit therein a felony or theft.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.