Barker v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1918
Citation profile
50 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently September 2015 · most notably 166 Ind. App. 199 - Merry v. State (1975), Marks v. State (1942)
50 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chicago & Erie Railroad v. Dinius · People v. . Heineman · People v. Gray · Leach v. State · Heath v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“such other acts are relevant and admissible, to show the lustful disposition of defendant as well as to show the existence and continuance of the illicit relation, to characterize and explain the act charged, and to corroborate the testimony of the prosecutrix as to that act.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Belcher v. State““... It is equally well settled that where the facts necessary to a conviction upon a second prosecution would not necessarily have convicted upon the first prosecution, then such acquittal would not be a bar to a second prosecution.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Boyle v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.