Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 188 IND 660 - Crouch & Son v. Parker

Crouch & Son v. Parker’s Empirical Analysis

1919

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
2
states following
August 1984
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently August 1984

7 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

9019191920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miller v. Stewart · Magee v. Manhattan Life Insurance · Post v. Losey · Weed Sewing Machine Co. v. Winchel · Weir Plow Co. v. Walmsley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is a sound and well-settled principle of law that sureties are not to be made liable beyond their contract and any agreement with the creditor, which varies essentially the terms of the contract, without the assent of the surety, will discharge him from responsibility. * * *”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.