Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 188 Md. 520 - Wanex v. Hurst

Wanex v. Hurst’s Empirical Analysis

1947

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
3
states following
September 1979
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently September 1979

12 state decisions

601947195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kelso v. Stigar · Potomac Lodge No. 31, I. O. O. F. v. Miller · Thistle v. Frostburg Coal Co. · Matthews v. Turner · Jay v. Michael

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Although the general rule is that recitals in a deed are mere hearsay and are inadmissible in evidence as against a third person who claims by a paramount title, there is an exception to this rule in the case of an ancient deed accompanied by possession and such a deed is admissible, even as against third persons, as prima facie evidence of the facts recited in it.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.