Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 188 Md. App. 126 - Malarkey v. State

188 Md. App. 126 - Malarkey v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (Hobbs Act)

Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Graham v. Connor · Benton v. Maryland · Green v. United States · Abney v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “By its terms, Md. Rule 4-324 does not authorize a court to reserve its ruling on a motion for judgment of acquittal, in contrast to the civil context. See Rule 2-532. The Court of Appeals and the General Assembly are obviously aware of F. R. Crim. P. 29. Neither has seen fit to conform Rule 4-324 to F. R. Crim. P. 29.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.