State v. Jeffrey’s Empirical Analysis
1933
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently May 1982
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Worthingham · State v. Nichols · State v. Nestaval · State ex rel. Johnson v. Becht · State v. Klitzke
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““These proceedings carry some earmarks of a criminal proceeding, but the substance is purely that of a civil action, which we hold it to be.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Riegel““No person shall be compelled, in any criminal case, to be a witness against himself.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“(2) The father's duty to his own child; and”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. EAH
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.