Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

188 Misc. 534

Hunt v. Hart

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided March 3, 1947

City of New York Municipal Court · decided 1947-03-03

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently March 1952

2 state decisions

Relies on Poillon v. . the Mayor, Etc., of the City of New York

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1947-03-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Faulkner, J.

¶1The tenancy in this proceeding is one from month to month or a tenancy for an indefinite period. The term began on the first day of the month and ended on the last day thereof. The notice required by section 232-b of the Beal Prbperty Law served by the landlord on December 16, 1946, specified that the tenant was required to vacate the premises on or before February 15,1947, which was not the anniversary date of the term.

¶2The law seems to be well settled that the surrender of possession date must coincide with the expiration of the term or rental period. (86 A. L. R. 1349; People ex rel. Botsford v. Darling, 47 N. Y. 666; Witherbee, Sherman & Co. v. Wykes, 159 App. Div. 24; 1938 Report of N. Y. Law Revision Commission, pp. 373, 384.)

¶3The Law Bevision Commission recommended that the Legislature adopt a new section of the Beal Property Law to be known as section 228-a which would permit a termination of such a tenancy at any time by a written notice of not less than thirty days. This recommendation was not adopted. The commission in support of such proposal said (p. 384): “ In order that uncertainty may be eliminated and flexibility attained, it seems desirable to permit the notice to become effective at the expiration of thirty days after the giving of the notice.”

¶4Motion to dismiss petition and precept granted.

/188/misc/534 · .json · Public domain