Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

188 Misc. 674

Greenberg v. Karnetsky

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · decided 1947-02-27

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 1947

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1947-02-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1Memorandum There is nothing, in the record to warrant a finding that the landlord does not intend to use the Office of Price Administration certificate for the purpose for which it was issued. Nor is there any evidence to support the claim that there was a renewal of a prior written lease. The tenant was not a party thereto and she presented no proof tending to show her right to succeed to the interest of the tenant named therein. Acceptance of rent by the landlord after issuance of the certificate and during pendency of the summary proceedings is no bar to their continuance. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1410, subd. 8.)

¶2The final order and judgment should be reversed upon the law and facts, with $30 costs to the landlord, and final order directed in favor of the landlord. Stay of warrant is granted until April Í, 1947.

¶3MacCratb, Steinbrink and Fennelly, JJ., concur.

¶4Order and judgment reversed, etc.

/188/misc/674 · .json · Public domain