Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 188 N.C. App. 334 - State v. Cross

188 N.C. App. 334 - State v. Cross’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
June 2009
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. Lucas · 35 N.C. App. 768 - Matthews v. North Carolina Department of Transportation · Matter of Swindell · Kendrick v. Cain · 108 N.C. App. 74 - Matter of Cowles

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'the subject matter of this [appeal] has ceased to exist and the issue is moot.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[A]n appeal presenting a question which has become moot will be dismissed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.