Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 188 N.C. App. 477 - Harris v. Harris

188 N.C. App. 477 - Harris v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
March 2014
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Quick v. Quick · Beall v. Beall · Rowe v. Rowe · Sayland Ex Rel. McLendon v. Sayland · 49 N.C. App. 463 - Britt v. Britt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he determination of what constitutes the reasonable needs and expenses of a party in an alimony action is within the discretion of the trial judge[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.