Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 188 Neb. 134 - State v. Etchison

State v. Etchison’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
4
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

50 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably 77 Ill. 2d 243 - People v. Nunn (1979), State v. Iromuanya (2006)

50 state decisions

260197219801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brown v. Globe Laboratories, Inc. · State v. Snell · State v. Rys · Penhansky v. Drake Realty Construction Co. · Christoffersen v. Weir

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “family ties, age, mentality, education, experience, and social and cultural background . . .; his willingness to work at honest labor; his past criminal record or law abiding conduct; the motivation for the offense, the nature of the offense, and the amount of violence, if any, involved; the frankness and willingness of the defendant to cooperate; narcotic addiction, if any; circumstances aggravating or mitigating the offense; community attitudes toward the offense; and the individual’s potentialities for reform or recidivism.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “In determining whether probation should be granted, and, if a sentence is to be imposed, its severity, there are many factors to be considered. The primary function of the criminal law is to protect individuals and society from the depredations of the criminally bent. In furtherance of this purpose, it is deemed necessary to mete out punishment as a deterrent to others and to lock up incorrigible criminals.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.