Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 188 Neb. 756 - Gaeth v. Newman

Gaeth v. Newman’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
July 2002
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently July 2002

16 state decisions

1001972198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pike v. Triska · Kucaba v. Kucaba · Blochowitz v. Blochowitz · Parkening v. Haffke · Montgomery v. Willbanks

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While circumstantial evidence may be sufficient, the circumstances must not be equally consistent with some other rational theory deducible from the facts proved.... In order to establish undue influence invalidating a deed, there must be proof that the circumstances of its execution were inconsistent with any hypothesis but undue influence, which must be proved in connection with the ■ conveyance in suit, and not with other things.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““ ‘ “Public policy forbids that deeds and mortgages of real estate, duly authenticated in the mode pointed out by statute, should be set aside except upon clear and convincing proof that the certificate of acknowledgment is false. The presumption is in favor of the certificate, and the burden is upon the party alleging such a defense to prove it.” ...’””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.