Phillips v. Phillips’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
September 1987
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Randall · Johnson v. Johnson · Hanson v. Hanson · Bauer v. Bauer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In determining the question of who should have the care and custody of children upon divorce, the paramount consideration is the best interests and welfare of the children. * * * “If the circumstances of the parties change and it is in the best interests of the children, the court may from time to time revise or alter a divorce decree so far as custody, care, and maintenance of children is concerned. * * * “In cases involving determinations of child custody, the findings of the trial court, both as to an evaluation of the evidence and as to the matter of custody, will not be disturbed unless there is a clear abuse of discretion.” Phillips v. Phillips, 188 Neb. 89 , 195 N. W. 2d 160 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lanz v. Lanz
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.