State v. Domicz’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 district · 62 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “If the front and back of a residence are readily accessible from a public place, like the driveway and parking area here, the Fourth Amendment is not implicated when officers go to the back door reasonably believing it is used as a principal entrance to the dwelling”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Carroll v. Carman · 135 S. Ct. 348 - Carroll v. Carman

2. “when a law enforcement officer walks to a front or back door for the purpose of making contact with a resident and reasonably believes that the door is used by visitors, he is not unconstitutionally trespassing on to the property”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Carroll v. Carman · 135 S. Ct. 348 - Carroll v. Carman

3. “lack of scientific consensus concerning the reliability of polygraph evidence, which in turn is reflected in the disagreement among state and federal courts concerning the admissibility of such evidence.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. 397 N.J. Super. 8 - State v. AO · State v. AO