188 N.J. Super. 416 - State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

9 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “The party States find that charges outstanding against a prisoner, detainers based on untried indictments, informations or complaints, and difficulties in securing speedy trial of persons already incarcerated in other jurisdictions, produce uncertainties which obstruct programs of prisoner treatment and rehabilitation. Accordingly, it is the policy of the party States and the purpose of this agreement to encourage the expeditious and orderly disposition of such charges and determination of the proper status of any and all detainers based on untried indictments, informations or complaints. The party States also find that proceedings with reference to such charges and detainers, when emanating from another jurisdiction, cannot properly be had in the absence of cooperative procedures. It is the further purpose of this agreement to provide such cooperative procedures. [State v. Johnson, 188 N.J.Super. 416, 421-22 , 457 A.2d 1175 (App.Div.1982), certif. denied, 93 N.J. 282 , 460 A.2d 681 (1983)(quoting N.J.S.A 2A:159A-1).]”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Miller

2. “We see no frustration of the purpose of the Interstate Agreement in this case.... When the judge in Hudson County extended the time for trial in that county he acted in recognition of the fact that defendant faced a murder trial in Warren County. Further, it was necessary to assign counsel to represent defendant in Hudson County. Certainly there is nothing in the record to indicate that the prosecutor was dilatory or did not intend to prosecute defendant. [ Id. at 422 , 457 A. 2d 1175 .]”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 272 N.J. Super. 68 - State v. Millett

3. “whether good cause exists ... must be resolved from a consideration of the totality of circumstances in [a] particular case.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 269 N.J. Super. 344 - State v. Buhl