Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 188 OHIOAPP3D 452 - State v. Sanders

State v. Sanders’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
December 2024
most recently cited

32 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Thompkins · 20 Ohio App. 3d 172 - State v. Martin · State v. Dehass · Seasons Coal Co. v. City of Cleveland · State v. Schiebel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A new trial should not be granted unless it affirmatively appears from the record that a defendant was prejudiced by one of the grounds stated in the rule or was thereby prevented from having a fair trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[L]etters from interested parties attempting to persuade the judge to their viewpoint or to bring some information to the judge's attention constitute improper ex parte communications.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “A reviewing court will not disturb a trial court's decision granting or denying a Crim.R. 33 motion for new trial absent an abuse of discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.