Jackson v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

5 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “a mistake or omission, mechanical in nature and apparent on the 1. Mother filed a Civ.R. 60(B) motion for relief from judgment, as well as a motion to strike. However, Mother's motion to strike asked the juvenile court to recognize that an error was made in attaching Appendix F, and to correct that error by striking Appendix F from the agreed entry. While a motion to strike can be used in regard to discovery, pleadings, or matters at trial, motions to strike are not the proper procedural method for correcting a trial court's entry when such contains a clerical error. See Civ.R. 60(A). Also, and unlike Civ.R. 60(B), which has a one year time limit for requests for relief from judgment, Civ.R. 60(A) does not have such a time limit, and corrections can be made "at any time.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. In re M.C.

2. “the name given to the motion is not controlling, but instead the substance, not the caption, determines the operative effect of the motion”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. In re M.C.