Spalla v. Fransen’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strock v. Pressnell · 66 Ohio App. 3d 826 - Parenti v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. · 128 Ohio App. 3d 546 - Cole v. American Industries & Resources Corp. · Natl. Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, PA v. Wuerth · 157 Ohio App. 3d 133 - Hurst v. Enterprise Title Agency, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““An escrow in Ohio, as between grantor and grantee of real estate, is witnessed by a written instrument known as an escrow agreement, delivered by mutual consent of both parties to a third party denominated the depositary or escrow agent, in which instrument certain conditions are imposed by both grantor and grantee, which conditions the depositary or escrow agent, by the acceptance and retention of the escrow agreement, agrees to observe and obey.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.