Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

188 P.3d 832

State v. Sandiford

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · decided 2008-06-24

Relies on State v. Stoa

Decided 2008-06-24

STATE OF HAWAI`I, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
LEMAR P. SANDIFORD, Defendant-Appellant

No. 28559

¶1Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii.

June 24, 2008.

¶2On the briefs:

¶3Jon N. Ikenaga, Deputy Public Defender, for Defendant-Appellant.

¶4Brian R. Vincent, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, City & County of Honolulu, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

¶5

SUMMARY DISPOSITION ORDER

¶6RECKTENWALD, C.J., FUJISE and LEONARD, JJ.

¶7Defendant-Appellant Lemar P. Sandiford (Sandiford) appeals the Notice of Entry of Judgment and/or Order and Plea/Judgment, filed on April 27, 2007 in the District Court of the First Circuit, Kaneohe Division (district court).[1]

¶8Sandiford was convicted of Excessive Speeding, in violation of Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 291C-105(a)(1) (Supp. 2007).

¶9On appeal, Sandiford contends inadmissible evidence was used to convict him and there was no substantial evidence to show that he acted with a reckless state of mind.

¶10Upon careful review of the record and the briefs submitted by the parties and having given due consideration to the arguments advanced and the issues raised by the parties, we resolve Sandiford's points of error as follows:

¶11Officer Vernon Kleinschmidt (Officer Kleinschmidt) testified that he was certified to operate the LTI 20/20 laser gun and on the date of the offense he calibrated the laser gun by performing the required tests, the self-test, scope alignment test, and the delta distance test and that the device was working properly. This testing was done approximately 30 minutes before he measured the speed of Sandiford's vehicle. Based on this record, it was not an abuse of discretion to admit the laser gun's reading of Sandiford's speed into evidence. State v. Stoa, 112 Hawai`i 260, 265, 268, 145 P.3d 803, 808, 811 (App. 2006).

¶12Officer Kleinschmidt stated that there were seven speed limit signs setting the speed limit as 25 miles per hour on Kailua Road between Kainehe Road/Hamakua Drive and Hanale Place. Officer Kleinschmidt stated that the laser gun reading showed that Sandiford was traveling 57 miles per hour. Officer Kleinschmidt stated that the location where Sandiford was traveling 57 miles per hour was a 25 mile per hour zone.

¶13The district court believed Officer Kleinschmidt's testimony and did not believe Sandiford's testimony that Sandiford was traveling 35-45 miles per hour on Kailua Road somewhere after Hanale Place. Sandiford consciously disregarded a substantial and unjustifiable risk of speeding 30 miles per hour over the speed limit after passing seven 25 mph speed limit signs. Therefore, there was sufficient evidence to convict Sandiford of excessive speeding.

¶14Therefore,

¶15The Notice of Entry of Judgment and/or Order and Plea/Judgment, filed on April 27, 2007 in the District Court of the First Circuit, Kaneohe Division, is affirmed.

NOTES

¶16[1] The Honorable Lono J. Lee presided.

/188/p3d/832 · .json · Public domain