Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 188 SO3D 710 - Q.S. v. State

Q.S. v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
July 2015
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 678 So. 2d 1041 - Ex Parte REC · 61 So. 3d 986 - Ex Parte Harrison · T.L.S. v. State · T.C. v. State · 834 So. 2d 816 - B.W. v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Custody is removed from parent/guardian and placed with Alabama Department of Youth Services (DYS) for a period of 6 months. This Court finds the following facts to be true: That this child has been adjudicated delinquent on Burglary 3, Top 1, YSFA, DC. Child has been to Autauga Hit Program. This Court is of the opinion that a defined sentence of 6 months is warranted, not only for the rehabilitation efforts of DYS, but for public safety. This child is a threat to the public. Restitution is reserved.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““the juvenile court did not include specific findings of .fact and did not include a reasoned analysis as to how -the determinate period was calculated to benefit the appellant or to further his rehabilitation. . It also did not plainly evidence its intent to incorporate its order into DYS’s service plan.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.