Menke v. Wendell’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 769 So. 2d 359 - Parisi v. Broward County · 384 So. 2d 279 - Lawrence v. Lawrence · 716 So. 2d 842 - Keitel v. Keitel · 203 So. 2d 530 - Hurley v. Werly · 751 So. 2d 64 - Knorr v. Knorr
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]hen a final judgment or order is not sufficiently explicit or precise to put the party on notice of what the party may or may not do, it cannot support a conclusion that the party willfully or wantonly violated that order.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.