Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

188 So. 3d 909

Travis Bush v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2016-03-24

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 2016

1 state decisions

Relies on Young v. State · Bell v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2016-03-24

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Travis Bush appeals from the judgment and sentence imposed by the trial court after it found that he had violated his probation. Although thére was competent, substantial evidence to support the trial court’s decision, we are compelled to remand because, as the State properly concedes, the trial court failed to enter a written order specifying the probation conditions violated. See Bell v . State, 60 So.3d 558, 558 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011); Young v. State, 4 So.3d 1265, 1266 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009).

¶2 Accordingly, we affirm the conviction and sentence but remand for. .entry of a proper revocation order specifying which conditions Bush was found to have violated.

¶3 AFFIRMED; case REMANDED for entry of a proper adjudication order.

TORPY, BERGER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
/188/so3d/909 · .json · Public domain