Gaut v. Dunlap’s Empirical Analysis
1916
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently September 1963
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cornelius v. Harris · Edwards v. Atkinson · Hill v. Kerr
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A ‘deal’ has been defined to be ‘an arrangement to attain a desired result by a combination of interested parties.’ Ball v. Davenport, 170 Iowa, 33 , 152 N. W. 72 . The result desired by the parties in this case was an exchange of properties, and, considered in the light of this definition, it could not be closed until the exchange had been effected.” Gaut v. Dunlap et al. (Tex. Civ. App.) . 188 S. W. 1020, 1021 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Walser v. Calley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.