¶1Appellant was convicted of burglary; his punishment being assessed at two years’ confinement in the penitentiary. There is neither a bill of_ exceptions nor statement of facts contained in the record. Witlv out these documents there is nothing presented in the record for consideration. The judgment is affirmed.
188 S.W. 1191
Rainey v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided October 18, 1916
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1916-10-18
<p>Appeal from Criminal District Court, Dallas County; W. L. Crawford, Jr., Judge. Will Rainey was convicted of burglary, and appeals.</p>
Affirmed · Decided 1916-10-18